CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY
ULLC 100
Wilderness as Sacred Place
Instructor: Dr. Kip Redick
Office: BTC 211
Phone: 594-7801
Email: kredick@cnu.edu
Fax: 594-7349
Office Hours: Open hours are 10-11:30 a.m. and 2-3:30 p.m. Monday and Wednesday.
Regular appointments are
10-11:30 a.m. Tuesday and Thursday, to be scheduled with the
secretary. Or, special appointments can be scheduled with me for
other times as needs dictate.
Secretary: Princess Nilen
Phone: 594-8827
Introduction to the Course:
Sacred places are prevalent in various religious traditions and serve
as conduits between human beings and the Holy. Mircea Eliade writes,
“three cosmic levels–earth, heaven, underworld–have
been put in communication” and “a sacred place constitutes
a break in the homogeneity of space; this break is symbolized by an
opening by which passage from one cosmic region to another is made
possible.” In wilderness there are no human artifacts, nothing
for the traveler to use as an orienting device in order to understand
the world as a place of human habitation. Wilderness speaks from beyond
culture, presenting something of value that has not been
produced. Those who seek solace in wilderness are confronted by
the sublime and reoriented to that which stands outside of culture. On
the other hand, highly elaborated technology as purveyor of the
profane, producing a multiplicity of artifacts en mass, threatens the
communicative efficacy of traditional religious symbols. Wilderness in
its evocation of the sublime calls attention to this situation and
thereby serves as a symbol of reorientation, an extant axis
mundi. Those who engage in spiritual journeys have gone into the
wilderness in various landscapes including desert and rugged mountain
expanses. Forest monks and desert hermits are two designations
for people who have sought solace or spiritual awakening in
wilderness. Entering the wilderness for these pilgrims becomes a
spiritual journey. The American wilderness can be compared to
recognized sacred places where monks and hermits have journeyed.
Those who hike wilderness trails are exposed to a potential sacred
topography. This class will examine wilderness trails as
rhetorical artifacts from a religious perspective. The class will
read various accounts of contemporary wilderness hikers and discover
with those hikers wilderness as sacred place.
Goals:
The means and media for better understanding wilderness as sacred place
will be reading, interpreting, analyzing, and critically evaluating
various texts, handouts, images, music, and a few video presentations.
Coming to understand wilderness as sacred place will be facilitated
through group discussions. Therefore, clear writing and the
presentation of the ideas expressed in that writing is necessary for
the achievement of goals. Clear writing will enhance peer critique and
class assignment completion. The following are general goals which
individuals should incorporate into the learning experience (note that
each goal should be preceded by the statement "the improvement of"):
reading comprehension, interpretation skills, analytical ability,
critical thinking skills, evaluation of problems, ability to
synthesize, clear and concise writing skills, participation in group
dynamics, use of technology, individual effort toward solving a problem
in the context of a group. The following goals are related to religion
and our study of wilderness as sacred place (again each goal should be
preceded by the statement "the improvement of"): an understanding of
sacred signs and symbols and their relation to the natural environment,
an understanding of the ontological status of wilderness, a knowledge
of communication media related to religious expression, a familiarity
with diverse religious cultures and their relationship with local
ecosystems as well as their methods of integrating religious
consciousness with local ecosystems, and an understanding of the
students own religious practices that relate to ecosystems.
Objectives:
The following objectives are closely related to the goals listed above;
they are simply a distillation of the goals. Keep these short
statements outlining the course objectives in mind as a way of
reminding yourself of the goals listed above. I will list the
statements below and then offer a brief explanation of each.
1. Gaining a broader understanding and appreciation of
intellectual/cultural activity (in relation to religion and its
expression in movies).
2. Acquiring an interest in learning more by asking questions and seeking answers.
3. Developing skill in expressing oneself orally or in writing.
4. Developing skills in working with group members.
Discussing, reflecting upon, and writing about wilderness and its
connection to the sacred is one way of exploring our culture. The
primary objective of this class is to gain a broader understanding of
the way religion is experienced in the context of wilderness. The
student is encouraged to employ learning through self motivated
discovery. Ask questions of each other, of your professor, and of
yourselves as a way of learning. Seek answers to these questions
through reading, both required and supplementary texts, as well as
through discussions with peers and your professor. Reflect on the idea
of wilderness as sacred landscape. This leads to the third objective,
learning through communicating both in writing and orally. Until the
learner has communicated an acquired knowledge, there is no way of
determining whether that knowledge is valuable or relevant.
Communication amongst peers allows for mutual critique. This leads to
the final objective, students gain insight and skills in working with
team members. Much learning takes place as the student searches for
knowledge while sitting quietly with a book, or through quiet
reflection, or in producing a piece of writing. However, much learning
also takes place in a group environment where people share ideas,
critique each other's ideas, and offer constructive criticism
concerning a piece of writing.
Assignments:
Students will be required to write essays and engage in oral discussion
related to these essays. There will be seminar essays in which
individual class members are assigned areas to present for
discussion. There will also be exploratory essays in which
individual class members write a general essay related to an assigned
topic. Students will also write a research paper and critique a
peer’s research paper. Finally, each class member will keep a
reading and reflection journal.
Course Texts:
Gatta, John. Making Nature Sacred: Literature, Religion, and
Environment in America from the Puritans to the
Present. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.
Lane, Belden C. Landscapes of the Sacred: Geography and Narrative in American Spirituality.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2001.
Seminar essays, exploratory essays, and discussion:
You will receive reading and writing assignment objectives in relation
to either a seminar topic or a exploratory topic. You will respond to
the assignment objectives with a concise quality essay. Each essay will
provide the class with material that will add to the assignment
discussion. Each essay should be between 500 and 900 words, that is
about 2-4 single spaced or 3-6 double spaced pages; it is more
important that the assignment topic be covered by a full discussion.
This essay will provide the class with material that will add to the
assignment discussion. Each essay will have a bibliography and
parenthetical references. Essays will be kept in a folder to be
presented to the instructor at regular intervals for grading and
feedback. Make note of the criteria for a quality essay below.
Criterion for quality essays:
An essay or paper is the individual's opinion that is the result of
research related to a topic issue. The issue is communicated in the
form of a question. Quality writing clearly addresses the topic issue
and communicates to the reader the writer's informed opinion. It also
engages the reader in a kind of conversation by inviting the reader to
think and reflect upon areas of interest that the writer finds
fascinating and important in relation to the topic question. The
writer's aim is to come to some understanding of the question and to
engage the reader's attention and thought, attempting to show the
reader how the writer came to such an understanding. Understanding is
attained and determined through an ability to support assertions in
writing, as well as through clear illustrations and explanations.
Within the essay there should be statements that are assertions as to
the opinion of the individual. These assertions should be supported by
statements which link the assertion to facts learned in research and/or
personal experience--although personal experience used as support
should be clearly qualified. It is important in supporting assertions
to cite appropriate support sources. Contrasting opinions and support
for those opinions should be explored in order to come to better
understanding in relation to the topic issue. That is, it is a valuable
practice for the writer to consider alternative opinions before
reaching any final conclusions. Finally, the paper should establish a
clear conclusion. The reader should have access to the writer's final
opinion as to the answer to the topic issue. It should be clear to the
reader that the conclusion has been supported, alternatives has been
addressed, and the writer's opinion is probable.
Research Paper:
Research papers will conform to the MLA Handbook and are to be 6 pages,
typed with 12 point font, double-spaced, and have a bibliography. They
will be written on a topic of choice that has been approved. No
two students will be allowed to write on the same topic, and topics
will be assigned first come first choice. The student must have at
least five bibliographic sources not including encyclopedic,
dictionary, or required texts. Students may use Internet sites as a
source but they will only count as one source. The student is
responsible for choosing a topic and getting it approved. The student
is encouraged to write a personal reflection of at least a page within
the body of the paper. Note the section on criteria of quality essays
and incorporate those principles into the writing of the paper. There
are four parts to this assignment: 1) Thesis statement and paragraph
description of the project, 15 points; 2) Outline and bibliography, 15
points; 3) Submit a rough draft to a peer, 15 points; 4) Final draft,
55 points. The thesis statement and paragraph describing the project
will be submitted by the beginning of the 5th week. The outline
and bibliography of the paper will be submitted by the 8th week.
A rough draft of the paper will be given to a peer for critique at the
beginning of the 10th week. A critique of your peer’s paper
is to be given to them by the 12th week. The final draft of the paper
and your critique of a peer’s paper will be submitted at the
beginning of the 14th week. Your thesis, paragraph description,
outline, bibliography, peer’s critique of your paper, and your
critique of a peer’s paper are to be included in a file folder
that will be submitted with the final draft. Note the section on
criteria of quality essays and incorporate those principles into the
writing of the paper.
Thesis Statement:
A thesis statement is a sentence that introduces the reader to both
your topic and your point of view concerning that topic. In
formulating your point of view make sure that you are addressing a
central question or problem that your topic raises. One way to
compose a thesis statement is to start with a short paragraph that
describes your topic of interest and then raises some important
questions that are relevant. You will have to craft that
paragraph so that your choice of language highlights a topic that will
peak a reader’s interest, and at the same time choose questions
that further draw that reader into your project. After crafting
this paragraph, distill the content into a single sentence.
Critical Response to a Research Paper:
Students will write a critical response to one of their peer's research
paper. Choice of paper to respond to will be approved prior to writing
the critique. The response will note both strengths and
weaknesses of the paper to which it is addressed. The response should
elaborate on the positive use of clear language, concise phrasing, use
of analogy, illustration and/or example, as well as a proper use of
primary texts in support of assertions. Weaknesses noted will include a
lack of support for opinions, unqualified personal experience used to
support assertions, a lack of clarity in communicating ideas, a lack of
coherence within the overall structure and subject matter of the paper,
a lack of fidelity in relation to existing research on the topic, and
anything the reader thinks may be improved in the paper. The length of
the response should be no less than one page or 300 words, but reflect
a full review of the paper to which it is addressed.
Reading and Reflection Journal:
Each student will engage in the practice of journaling.
Your class reading and reflection journal will be compiled and kept
within a file folder and must be typed with a 12 point font.
Journal entries will be considered informal writing assignments and as
such will be graded more in relation to content than style. Journal
entries will contain questions and answers to questions, as well as
reflections which relate to daily classroom discussions, completion of
exercises, and reading assignments. Any questions the student has
when reading or completing assignments should be written in their
journal. The student should bring the journal to class daily and
ask those questions which were raised in specific journal
entries. As those questions are addressed and answered in the
classroom discussions, the student should make note of the discussion
and answers within the journal. This class journal will reflect
the quality of the students daily classroom participation and
completion of homework assignments, and will be graded with this in
mind. The journal may be submitted for grading at several times
during the course of the semester. The journal is not the same
thing as a compilation of class lecture notes; it is the product of
written personal reflection related to the class. A good journal will
contain at least 15 entries. At least 6 of the entries should be
reflections on the connection between assigned essay reading and the
required texts: 3 from Landscapes of the Sacred, and 3 from Making
Nature Sacred. At least 3 of the entries should focus on an
outside reading, something not assigned as part of the class
requirements. At least 2 of the entries will be the result of the
students experience of a natural setting, a visit during the
semester. Finally, 4 of the entries will be centered on a topic
of the student’s choosing. Each journal entry should be dated and
given a title related to the subject of reflection.
Daily Preparation and Classroom Participation:
Assignments are to be completed before class time begins. A lack
of preparation will affect participation in discussion. Weekly
assignments will be drawn from readings and expressed as essays.
These essays will contribute to classroom discussions. If
individuals are lacking in daily preparation, the class goals will not
be fully realized. Part of a successful class dynamic is analysis
of peer communication. Therefore an important part of daily
preparation involves analysis of communication within the context of
the classroom setting–whether that classroom in traditional or
electronic. Persons should feel some peer motivation toward
quality goal achievement. Mutual communication analysis is the
means to that achievement. If the student has had a problem
completing the assignment on time, the instructor should be notified
prior to class thus reducing a negative effect on that grade.
Although discussions will address much that is covered in the readings,
they will also include information not covered in the texts. Both
the instructor and the students will bring supplemental material to
class. Therefore participation and attentiveness during
discussions is of the utmost importance. Reading analysis is
integral to quality classroom discussion. The student is
encouraged to complete reading assignments even though material is not
understood. Material which is unclear should be noted for
classroom discussion. Material that is unclear should be noted in
the body of the reading and reflection journal, and after clarification
has been made, a subsequent entry should be made in regards to the
clarification. Thus some essays will included an addendum that
reflects questions which are answered. Noting material for
discussion involves writing questions during study sessions.
Learners who use written questions to stimulate classroom discussions
will be rewarded for good classroom participation. Written
questions should be incorporated into the student’s reading and
reflection journal. Students are held responsible for all the
concepts in the reading assignments. If there are no questions
asked during the discussions, it is assumed that the students
understand the material completely.
The Nature of Discussion:
Discussion is the vehicle through which the participant grows in
understanding. Intuition is the feeling that one has understanding of a
concept or situation but that understanding has not been expressed in
language. Often the attempt to set the intuition in the form of
language proves difficult. Expressions abound which describe such
situations, "I know it but I just can't get my thoughts into words."
Integral to clear thinking is putting thought into language. If
thoughts are not set in language they can not be examined. Our
unexamined opinions may lead us into undesired situations. Intuition
which goes unchallenged or unexamined has no basis from which to act
except whim.. Once our thoughts are expressed they need support. An
unsupported opinion is like a boat drifting upon the sea. In order to
fully examine our thoughts they need to be supported. Once we have set
thought into language and supported those opinions they are ready to be
challenged. The challenge serves to expose a faulty position or a weak
spot in an otherwise strong argument. Thought expressed in and
supported by language, examined from every angle, and defended from a
good challenge is thought that leads toward understanding. Discussion
is the vehicle we will use to walk through the critical steps mentioned
above. Discussion will only flourish in an atmosphere of mutual
enquiry. The persons participating in this class come from diverse
backgrounds but there are no experts. We begin the class in need of
understanding. We will not arrive at that understanding until we have
traveled together through the texts and have experienced valid
discussion. There is no reason to feel intimidated about a lack of
knowledge or difficulty with expression. The lack of knowledge or
difficulty with expression is something that can be improved through
the discussion process. Therefore, there are no "stupid" questions.
Good discussion comes through mutual respect and thorough research.
Since we are trying to understand religion and ecology in a group
atmosphere we will learn together. There "is" strength in numbers.
There can also be better understanding when people help each other.
General Policies:
Attendance:
Absences beyond a minimal number may well have negative influence on a
student’s grade for the course. 20% of the course grade is
based on classroom participation and discussion. More than three
unexcused absences will result in the lowering of the participation
grade by 10 points.
Grading:
Midterm and final exams will comprise 30% of the course grade.
Essays will comprise a total of 15% of the course grade. The paper will
comprise 25% of the course grade. The reading and reflection journal
will comprise 10% of the course grade. Class participation will
comprise 20% of the course grade.
The CNU Honor Code
"On my honor, I will maintain the highest possible standards of
honesty, integrity and personal responsibility. That means I will not
lie, cheat, or steal and as a member of this academic community, I am
committed to creating an environment of respect and mutual trust."
Students with Disabilities:
If you believe that you have a disability, you should make an
appointment to discuss your needs. In order to receive an
accommodation, your disability must be on record in Disability Services
located in the Academic Advising Center, Student Union, Room 3125
(Telephone - 594-8763; Fax - 594-8765).
Discussion Concerning Syllabus:
Because this is both a traditional and an electronic classroom and we
are not all reviewing the syllabus orally. A hard copy of the syllabus
will be handed out in the traditional classroom and any online student
is welcome to pick up a hard copy of the syllabus at any time. All
students are encouraged to discuss items within the syllabus. This
discussion should clear up any ambiguous or vague language that may be
in the document. It also serves to clarify the students understanding
of course expectations, goals, and direction. If the student does not
have questions or comments then it will be assumed that there is full
understanding. Remember the nature of discussion and the dynamic
between instructor/peer and peer/peer. There is no reason to feel
intimidated about getting into a discussion.